Mapping the Future of Teaching and Learning in a Post-Humanist Academic Landscape

Authors

  • Reza Alfarizi Universitas Sumatera Utara Author
  • Intan Permata Sari Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia Author
  • Farhan Abdullah National University of Malaysia, Malaysia Author

Keywords:

Posthumanism; Teaching and Learning; New Materialism; Actor–Network Theory; Post-Phenomenology.

Abstract

This study explores the direction of teaching and learning in the posthuman era by examining key theoretical perspectives, namely post-anthropocentrism, new materialism, Actor–Network Theory (ANT), and post-phenomenology. The study is based on a literature review of relevant academic sources to understand how educational practices are reshaped by rapid technological development and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The findings indicate that learning is no longer an exclusively human cognitive process, but rather an emergent outcome of interactions among humans, non-human actors, and material environments. Technologies, digital platforms, and material objects are found to actively participate in shaping knowledge construction and learning experiences. Furthermore, the role of teachers shifts from knowledge authorities to facilitators within dynamic learning networks. The study concludes that posthuman educational thought promotes a more distributed, adaptive, and interconnected model of learning that reflects contemporary socio-technical realities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

Bostrom, N. (2003). Are you living in a computer simulation? Philosophical Quarterly, 53(211), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00309

Bostrom, N. (2005). A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1014088

Bozalek, V., & Zembylas, M. (2016). Critical posthumanism, new materialisms and the affective turn for socially just pedagogies in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.20853/30-3-652

Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.

Busso, D. S., & Pollack, J. (2015). No brain left behind: Consequences of neuroscientific knowledge for education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(2), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.908957

Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Duke University Press.

Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2011). Researching education through actor-network theory. Wiley-Blackwell.

Gamble, C. N., Hanan, J. S., & Nail, T. (2019). What is new materialism? Angelaki, 24(6), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2019.1684704

Ha, J., & Lee, S. (2021). Edutech and posthuman educational transformation. International Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 45–60.

Haraway, D. J. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press.

Jang, H., Shin, Y., & Park, M. (2019). Posthumanism and education in the fourth industrial revolution era. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(10), 1–12.

Kim, S. (2023). Digital transformation and education in the posthuman era. Journal of Future Education, 15(1), 22–38.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

Lee, Y. (2021). Teaching and learning in the posthuman age. Asian Journal of Education, 42(3), 311–330.

Neimanis, A. (2017). Bodies of water: Posthuman feminist phenomenology. Environmental Humanities, 9(1), 1–10.

Oh, J., & Cho, H. (2020). Rethinking education in the posthuman era. Korean Journal of Educational Studies, 58(4), 77–95.

Park, S. (2019). Post-anthropocentrism and education. Journal of Educational Philosophy, 41(2), 55–70.

Porter, A. C. (2023). Transhumanism and posthumanism(s) on education. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 31(4), 475–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2023.2287650

Simonsen, K. (2013). In search of experience: Postphenomenology and geography. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3(3), 233–241.

Toohey, K. (2022). New materialism in education research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(6), 789–801.

Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State University Press.

Yu, H. (2023). Digital literacy and postmodern education transformation. Journal of Contemporary Education Research, 12(2), 101–115.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-09

How to Cite

Mapping the Future of Teaching and Learning in a Post-Humanist Academic Landscape. (2024). Beacon: International Journal of Education and Social Studies , 1(2), 77-83. https://pelitapendidikaninternasional.com/beacon/article/view/10